Search toggle
Say hello.
Focus Str. 5th Ave, 98/2 34746 Manhattan, New York
+1 222 44 55
Real Briefings

Hearing Examiner

BEL-HEX-2025-10-24 October 24, 2025 Public Hearing City of Bellingham
← Back to All Briefings
Oct
Month
24
Day
Min
Published
Status

Hearing Examiner Sharon Rice conducted an impound appeal hearing for Scotty Fermo, whose vehicle was towed during the September 21, 2025 Bellingham Bay Marathon. The hearing examined whether the city properly posted no-parking signs and whether Fermo's vehicle was legally parked on Railroad Avenue when it was impounded by Heston Hauling. Fermo argued that his vehicle was parked in a legal space because the no-parking sign was on an adjacent meter, not directly in front of his parking space. He contended that marathon organizers' website indicated "you can park anywhere downtown for free" and that sporadic sign placement created confusion about which specific spaces were restricted. City Parking Code Compliance Officer Stephanie Mays testified that temporary no-parking signs were properly posted according to Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards, which require only two signs per block to make the entire block off-limits. She explained that approximately 30 vehicles were towed citywide during the marathon, with advance warning signs posted three days before the event. Towing operator Chris Heston of Heston Hauling confirmed standard state-regulated rates were applied: $400 minimum one-hour tow charge, $50.50 half-day storage fee, and $201 after-hours retrieval fee on Sunday, totaling $710.14. Fermo paid the charges and retrieved his vehicle the same day. The hearing examiner will issue a written decision by November 7, 2025, determining whether the impound was lawful and whether Fermo is entitled to reimbursement of towing and storage fees.

No formal decisions were made during this hearing. Hearing Examiner Sharon Rice received testimony from all parties and will issue a written decision within 10 business days (by November 7, 2025) determining: - Whether the vehicle impound was lawful under city code - Whether temporary no-parking signs were properly posted according to MUTCD standards - …

About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
The central policy issue involves interpretation of temporary no-parking sign requirements under the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Officer Mays testified that MUTCD standards require only two signs per block to prohibit parking on the entire block, while Fermo argued that drivers should reasonably expect each restricted parking space to have its own sign. This case highlights tensions between public safety requirements for special events and public understanding of parking restrictions. The marathon required clearing Railroad Avenue for thousands of runners, with the city ultimately towing approximately 30 vehicles despite multiple advance wa…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Scotty Fermo (Appellant):** Argued his vehicle was legally parked because no sign was directly on his meter, only on an adjacent meter. Cited marathon website encouraging downtown parking and questioned whether drivers can reasonably be expected to know that signs on adjacent meters apply to entire blocks. Noted other vehicles remained parked after the race, suggesting the area wasn't critical for runner safety. **Stephanie Mays (Parking Code Compliance Officer 2):** Defended the impound as lawful under MUTCD standards requiring only two signs per block. Emphasized that drivers must be aware of…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Fermo, on sign interpretation:** "If there's no sign on the spot in front of me, I generally look at that and say, well, that's a valid parking spot. The one next to it, of course, isn't, because the sign's in front of that." **Fermo, on website guidance:** "The event coordinator website said something like, if you're leaving your car, then I'll quote, if you're leaving your car at the finish line, you can park anywhere downtown for free." **Mays, on driver responsibility:** "It is up to t…
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →

**November 7, 2025:** Deadline for Hearing Examiner's written decision on appeal **Ongoing:** Additional impound appeals related to the same marathon event are being processed **Future:** Police department working with marathon organizers to update website and improve parking communica…

About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
Before this hearing, the city had collected $710.14 in towing fees from Scotty Fermo for his vehicle impounded during the marathon. After the hearing, the matter is under formal review with a written decision pending that could either uphold the impound as lawful or order reimbursement of all fees. The hearing created an official record establishing the city's position that MUTCD standards requiring only two signs per block are sufficient notice, while documenting Fermo's a…
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
# City Vehicle Impound Appeal: When a Marathon Runner Challenges a Tow The October 24, 2025 Bellingham Hearing Examiner session opened with a familiar refrain — Hearing Examiner Sharon Rice mistakenly announcing it as a June hearing before quickly correcting herself with a chuckle about the "time warp." But beneath this lighthearted moment lay a serious civic matter that would illuminate the intersection of event planning, parking enforcement, and individual rights. At stake was $710.14 in towing and storage fees that Scotty Fermo, a Bellingham Bay Marathon participant, was challenging after his vehicle was impounded on September 21, 2025. The case, filed as HE25VI-037, would explore fundamental questions about how clear temporary parking restrictions need to be and whether good-faith confusion can justify overturning an impound. Rice, an attorney who contracts as hearing examiner for Bellingham and nine other jurisdictions, noted this was one of approximately 30 appeals stemming from the marathon — a significant enforcement action that would keep her busy issuing decisions well into November. ## The City's Case: Comprehensive Signage for Public Safety Stephanie Mays, a Parking Code Compliance Officer 2, methodically walked through the city's preparation for the September 21 marathon, beginning with the August 28 notification from the permits department. The event would host over 1,500 participants and require extensive street closures through downtown Bellingham. "On September 15th, parking was notified by the event coordinator and Bellingham Police Department that we needed to assist with vehicle impounds that were parked along the no parking routes," Mays testified. The coordination was extensive — by September 17, she had…
About 14% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
### Meeting Overview City of Bellingham Hearing Examiner Sharon Rice conducted an impound appeal hearing for Scott Fermo, whose vehicle was towed during the September 21, 2025 Bellingham Bay Marathon. The hearing examined whether the towing was valid under temporary no-parking restrictions established for the marathon route. ### Key Terms and Concepts **Hearing Examiner:** An independent attorney who conducts administrative hearings for the City of Bellingham on matters like impound appeals, providing due process outside the regular court system. **MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices):** Federal standards that govern traffic signs and signals, requiring at least two temporary no-parking signs per block to establish valid restrictions. **Police Tow/Law Enforcement Tow:** Category of tow ordered by city parking enforcement that qualifies for specific state-regulated fees, as opposed to private property or accident tows. **Temporary No-Parking Signs:** Paper signs placed by event organizers to restrict parking during special events, which have the same legal force as permanent signs when properly posted. **After-Hours Fee:** Additional charge applied when vehicles are retrieved outside normal business hours (weekends, holidays, or after 5 PM weekdays). **Impound Appeal:** Administrative process allowing vehicle owners to challenge the validity of a tow and potentially recover towing and storage fees. **Class A Tow Truck:** Smallest category of tow truck with minimum hourly rates set by Washington State for police-ordered tows. ### Key People at This Meeting | Name | Role / Affiliation | |---|---| | Sharon Rice | Hearing Examiner (Contract Attorney) | | Scott "Scotty" Fermo | Appellant (Marathon Participant) | | Stephanie Mays | Parking Code Compliance Officer 2 | | Chris Heston | Owner, Heston Hauling (Towing Company) | | Ms. Bowker | City Staff (Administrative Support) | ### Background Context The Bellingham Bay Marathon is a major annual …
About 49% shown — premium members only Upgrade to premium →

Share This Briefing