Search toggle
Say hello.
Focus Str. 5th Ave, 98/2 34746 Manhattan, New York
+1 222 44 55
Real Briefings

Whatcom County Council

WHA-CON-2025-12-02 December 02, 2025 Whatcom County Council Regular Whatcom County
← Back to All Briefings
Dec
Month
02
Day
Min
Published
Status

The Whatcom County Council held a critical special meeting to finalize the 2026 budget through a series of public hearings and votes on tax levies and budget amendments. The meeting resulted in the adoption of most proposed tax increases, including controversial 1% levy increases for county roads, EMS services, conservation futures, and the general fund, along with approval of a $20.97 million budget amendment. The most significant development was the council's decision to approve "bank capacity" increases — taking the full 1% allowed under state law — for most county functions despite strong public opposition to tax increases. The EMS levy increase was particularly contentious, raising the rate from what voters previously approved to the maximum allowed, representing what Council Member Ben Elenbaas called a "19% increase" that is "slightly sensationalized" but actually reflects a 1% increase over the voter-approved rate. The flood control zone district provided the only surprise of the day when the 1% levy increase failed 3-3, forcing the council to approve the alternate 0% increase option. This represented a rare instance where the council rejected a staff-recommended tax increase, with Deputy Executive Aly Pennucci warning that continued rejection of 1% increases makes it "ever harder to deliver on projects" and maintain adequate fund balances. Public testimony was dominated by EMS supporters, including Fire Chief Ben Boyko of Fire District 7 who described life-saving equipment purchases enabled by previous levy funding, and citizen representative Jim Hallett who praised the county's "world class EMS system." However, several speakers including Lyle Sorenson and Hannah Ortiz challenged the council's spending patterns, with Sorenson criticizing the council for never rejecting budget amendments and calling taxpayers "not a bottomless reservoir." The council's internal tensions were clearly visible, with Elenbaas delivering sharp criticism of his colleagues' co

**Flood Control Zone District Budget (AB2025-711):** APPROVED 4-2 (Byrd, Stremler no; Elenbaas absent initially). Staff recommendation aligned with council action. **Flood Control Zone District 1% Levy (AB2025-709):** FAILED 3-3 (Byrd, Donovan, Stremler no). Staff recommended approval; council rejected. **Flood Control Zone District 0% Levy (AB2025-784):** APPROVED 6-0 with Elenbaas absent. Alternative option to failed 1% levy. **2026 County Budget Amendment (AB2025-707):** SUBSTITUTE ADOPTED 4-3 ($20,970,606 increase; Byrd, Elenbaas, Stremler no). Includes council amendments for food bank funding, strategic plan, prosecutor FTE, and court staff. **Conservation…

About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Budget Philosophy and Fiscal Responsibility:** The meeting revealed fundamental philosophical divisions within the council about spending and taxation. Elenbaas argued that the council has established a pattern where "99.999% of the time that I vote no, I'm not supported" and noted that in his experience, the council has only once rejected a budget request. He criticized his colleagues for creating expectations that all spending requests will be approved, saying "if your kids know you always say yes, they'll never stop asking." This criticism was echoed by public speakers, with Lyle Sorenson stating bluntly, "I don't think I've ever seen a budget amendment that came to you that you didn't pass." Several council members acknowledged this dynamic, with Stremler noting the need for council to "find budget cuts" and Donovan reluctantly supporting items while warning about the fiscal hole being created for future years. **Road Fund Structural Issues:** The road levy discussion exposed significant structural problems in how rural road services are funded. Council Member Donovan explained that residents in unincorporated areas pay approximately $850 annually in road fund taxes on top of other county taxes, while city residents pay nothing toward rural roads despite using them. He noted this creates an unsustainable burden on a shrinking tax base, especially if areas like Birch Bay incorporate. Council Member Elenbaas, who supported the road levy despite his general opposition to tax increases, explained his reasoning based on the Public Works Department's track record: "There's historically been one department that has risen above all the rest, in my opinion, with their transparency, with their follow through, with their communication and with their adherence to their requested budgets." He contrasted this with other departments, noting that Public W…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Fire and EMS Community:** Strong unified support for the EMS levy increase. Fire Chief Ben Boyko (Fire District 7) detailed specific equipment improvements funded by previous levies, including crash-rated gurneys that reduced worker injuries and cardiac monitors that enable heart attack identification in the field. He reported reviewing two recent cases where paramedics activated hospital cardiac teams before transport, including a 30-year-old female patient. Jim Hallett, citizen representative on the EMS oversight board, praised the county's "world class EMS system" and emphasized the community investment represented. Fire Commissioner Randy VanderHeiden (Fire District 1) called the EMS funding decision potentially "life or death" and urged support for the levy rate "suggested by the EMS providers, backed by its oversight board, approved by the voters." **Public Works Support:** Public Works Director Elizabeth Kosa provided technical details on levy impacts, noting that the 1% flood control levy increase would cost average households $0.69 annually. She confirmed that rejecting the increase would require using fund balance rather than delaying projects initially, though Deputy Executive Pennucci warned of longer-term impacts on service delivery.…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Council Member Ben Elenbaas, on council spending patterns:** "My time on council, I can recall one budget item that did not pass once, one time this council has said no when people have come to us for money." **Fire Chief Ben Boyko, on EMS equipment impact:** "Just last week, I reviewed two cases where our paramedics identify critical findings on scene and initiated treatment and activated cath lab before the transport. One of those cases was 30 year old female patient in medicine. There's …
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →

**Community Conversations:** Council Member Scanlon announced two remaining community meetings — Thursday, December 5, 5-7 PM at Bellingham Public Schools district office for districts 1 and 2, and Thursday, December 12, 3-5 PM at Fair Haven library for district 1. **Biennial Budget Process:** Multiple council members referenced the upcoming biennial budget development beginning in early 2026, with expectations of requiring deeper cuts than the current mid-biennial adjustments. **EMS System Evalua…

About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Tax Rates Increased:** Most county tax rates will increase by 1% in 2026, including county roads ($5.70 annually for average home), EMS (to voter-approved maximum), conservation futures, and general fund levies. **Flood Control Funding Held Flat:** The only levy that did not increase, with the 1% option failing 3-3 and the 0% alternative approved 6-0. **Budget Amendment Approved:** $20.97 million in additional 2026 spending authorized, including council-added items for food banks, strategic planning, prosecutor staff, and court operations. **Service L…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
# The Whatcom County Budget Meeting That Mattered — A Story of Votes, Values, and Five-Dollar Trade-offs On a gray Tuesday afternoon in December, seven county council members gathered in the courthouse chambers to make decisions that would shape Whatcom County's financial future — and test their political mettle in ways that hadn't been seen in years. What unfolded over nearly two hours would be remembered not just for the millions in spending approved, but for the rare moments when this council actually said no. ## Meeting Overview The December 2, 2025 special meeting was the culmination of months of budget deliberations for Whatcom County Council. Chair Kaylee Galloway called the session to order at 1:02 PM, with all seven council members eventually present for a hybrid meeting that would cover ten separate budget items totaling over $20 million in new spending. This wasn't routine budget maintenance — it was a moment of reckoning. The county faced structural budget challenges, rising costs, and a community increasingly vocal about tax burdens. The agenda included everything from flood control funding to emergency medical services, from road repairs to conservation purchases. But underneath the technical ordinances and resolutions lay fundamental questions about the role of government and the limits of taxpayer patience. ## The Flood Control Prelude — A Glimpse of Things to Come The meeting began with three flood control zone district items, and immediately signaled that this would not be a typical rubber-stamp session. Director of Public Works Elizabeth Kosa fielded questions about a seemingly modest request for a 1% levy increase — worth about 69 cents per year for the average household. Council Member John Scanlon made the case for preparedness: "I'm going to speak in favor of this item and vote in favor of the 1% increase. It's a small increase at a household level. And lookin…
About 14% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
null…
About 100% shown — premium members only Upgrade to premium →

Share This Briefing